Jay-Z is sued by a 21-Year-old aspiring rapper 'Rymir Satterthwaite' claiming to be his Son

Jay-Z is facing a paternity suit filed by a 21-year-old aspiring rapper named Rymir Satterthwaite. According to court papers, filed in New Jersey in December 2014 through his godmother Lillie Coley, obtained by National Enquirer, Rymir claimed his mother Wanda had "steamy sex sessions" with Jay-Z in the early 1990s.

In his suit, Rymir accused Beyonce Knowles' husband of "blatantly lying to a court to avoid taking a paternity test." Court papers show the paternity fight dates back in June 2010 when Wanda first named Jay-Z as a possible father to her son after another man named Robert Graves who was believed to be Rymir's father since birth was not his biological father.

Wanda then tried to force Jay-Z to submit to a DNA test but failed because the case was dismissed by the court due to the lack of jurisdiction over the rapper.

In the December suit, Lillie accused Jay-Z and his lawyer Lise Fisher of providing "fraudulent" and "false" information to a judge. Lillie claimed the rapper lied about his address to avoid paternity test. Jay-Z reportedly told the court that he lives in Manhattan, not in New Jersey where he reportedly owns three houses.

Lillie told New York Daily News that the family was surprised that the news emerged this week even though the fight goes back five years. "Right now I can't talk to you about it," she said, "We plan to talk to the public soon. All this attention caught us off guard. We didn't expect someone to leak it to the press. We weren't expecting this."

Jay-Z's representative has not commented on the issue yet, while Rymir tweeted on Thursday, February 19, "Trying to stay positive."

Read More

Gerrard accuses Mario Balotelli of disrespect to stand-in skipper Jordan Henderson

Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard accused Mario Balotelli of 'showing disrespect' to stand-in skipper Jordan Henderson as he insisted on taking the penalty that secured his side a valuable 1-0 victory in the first leg of their Europa League clash with Besiktas.
Gerrard, who missed the game through injury, confirmed Henderson was the designated penalty taker for the Reds and yet it was Balotelli who wrestled the ball from the grasp of the England midfielder to take the spot kick.
Gerrard was not impressed with the attitude of the match-winner and made his feelings clear as he spoke to ITV Sport.

"Jordan is the captain and Mario would have seen that Jordan was on penalties and he has shown him a but of disrespect there, but he we have got away with it," said Gerrard. "If I was on the pitch, I'd have taken the penalty, that's what would have happened. Basically Jordan Henderson should have taken that penalty and Mario has been a bit mischievous by standing in front of him and going against the manager's plan.
"Fair play to him, he finished the penalty off, but it would have been very interesting in that dressing room if he had missed the penalty. It's a fantastic penalty, it's a big goal and fair play to him, but it's more than that.
"Around six or seven people in the team would have wanted to take that penalty, so what happens if six or seven people are fighting over the ball around the penalty spot.
"It's not nice to see players taking the ball off each other on a penalty. For me, rules are rules and codes are codes inside a dressing room. When a manager selects a penalty taker, that penalty taker should take it. It should have been Henderson.
"Jordan handled the situation very well. He knows Mario wants the penalty really badly, Mario is desperate to get on the score sheet. He has stepped away at the right time because I don't like to see it when players are fighting over the ball. It's not right for the image of the game.
"At the end of the day, what's important for myself and all the fans here is we got the win and it has put us in a very good position for next week."
Balotelli went to Instagram and thanked Henderson for the opportunity to take the shot:

Read More